SPECIAL

Maryland Association of REALTORS®    
MAR SPECIAL News Report  Thursday, March 2, 2006

 

Can Maryland REALTORS ® “Shop” Offers?

Effect of NAR Code of Ethics Changes on Maryland Practitioners.

Three significant changes to the NAR Code of Ethics became effective January 1, 2006. These changes have been the subject of much discussion and interpretation. We offer the following guidance.

First, Standard of Practice (SOP) 1-15 was amended. Previously, SOP 1-15 provided that REALTORS ®, with the seller’s consent and upon inquiries from buyers or cooperating brokers, shall disclose the existence of offers on any listed property. The new provision of SOP 1-15 now provides that where such disclosure is authorized by the seller, REALTORS ® shall also disclose whether the offers were obtained by the listing licensee, another licensee in the listing firm, or by a cooperating broker. Members are advised to review and/or have their attorney review all Listing Agreements to determine if they need to be amended to reflect the change.

Second, SOP 1-13, in subparagraph 5, now provides that when entering into buyer/tenant agreements, REALTORS ® must advise potential clients of the possibility that sellers or seller’s representatives may not treat the existence, terms, or conditions or offers as confidential unless confidentiality is required by law, regulation, or by any confidentiality agreement between the parties. There seems to be some confusion as to the substantive impact of this change. This is simply a notice provision. This change, by itself, does not allow REALTORS ® to “shop” offers. As more fully explained below, t he duty to treat all parties fairly and honestly under Maryland law means that, for a REALTOR ® representing the seller, the terms and conditions of an offer are confidential for purposes of application of SOP 1-13.

Third, a new change appears on page 69 of the 2006 NAR Code of Ethics and Arbitration Manual. It is in Appendix IX (Presenting and Negotiating Multiple Offers) to Part Four – The Ethics Hearing. The gray-shaded language, which appears at the top of the left column on page 69, is all new. It appears under a bullet point that reminds REALTORS ® of things to explain to buyers when entering into buyer representation agreements. This new language is nothing more than a reminder that, according to NAR, real estate brokers may, unless prohibited by law or regulation, “shop” offers. Under Maryland law sellers, since they are not bound by the real estate license law or the NAR Code of Ethics, are certainly free to “shop” offers. I t is completely unsettled under Maryland law whether a real estate licensee may “shop” offers. This is a key issue since the new language of the NAR Code of Ethics expressly conditions the rights of a REALTOR ® to “shop” offers on the absence of a prohibition in law or regulation.

In the early 1980s the Maryland Real Estate Commission discussed this matter informally at its monthly business meeting. At that time, it was the position of the Commission that the shopping of offers by a REALTOR ®, even where authorized by the seller, in the opinion of the Commission as then constituted, would be a violation of the real estate license law, which requires licensees to treat all parties fairly and honestly.

There is nothing in the real estate license law or the regulations as adopted by the Commission or the Code of Ethics of the Maryland Real Estate Commission that is directly on point in this matter. MAR is evaluating its options vis-ŕ-vis the Maryland Real Estate Commission and the Maryland Attorney General’s Office. It is foreseeable that the Commission would elect not to offer a formal advisory opinion, and we cannot predict what the Attorney General’s Office would conclude. Given this uncertainty, MAR will proceed with caution and with no predetermined time frame for resolution.

Unless and until such time as either the Maryland Real Estate Commission or the Attorney General’s Office provides a written opinion indicating that the shopping of offers by real estate licensees is not prohibited by law or regulation, it is MAR’s position that real estate licensees in Maryland may not shop offers, even if requested by the seller to do so.

Regarding the change to SOP 1-13, under current Maryland law, a buyer is not the client of the listing agent and the existence, terms and conditions of an offer made is not confidential unless it is an in-house transaction. In such instance, there may well be a duty of confidentiality between both the licensee acting as the buyer intra-company agent and the licensee acting as the intra-company agent on behalf of the seller.

Current buyer agency agreement forms should be amended to be consistent with the new NAR provision of SOP 1-13. However, such disclosure should be limited to the fact that the seller may not treat the existence, terms, or conditions of offers as confidential. On the other hand, recalling the discussion of the change on page 69, the duty to treat all parties fairly and honestly under Maryland law means that, for a REALTOR ® representing the seller, the terms and conditions of an offer are confidential for purposes of application of SOP 1-13.

For more information and assistance, contact Chuck Kasky or Don Martin—800-638-6425.

 

 

 

This email was sent to jannclark@smarweb.org, by info@mdrealtor.org

Powered by


Maryland Association of REALTORS | 2594 Riva Road | Annapolis | MD | 21401